Thank you. > On Wednesday 06 July 2011 18:05:29 you wrote: >> Just one more thing. >> >> For btrfs and other file systems, it is customary to have a separate >> boot >> partition, so that at a minimum, you have 3 partitions - /boot, Swap, >> and >> /. Would that be a problem for nilfs2? >> >> If it is ok to have a separate boot partition, does it make sense to use >> nilfs2 on it? Or is it better to use a non-journaling file system, like >> Linux Native (ext2) on the boot partition, and nilfs2 on /. > > > for reference, my setup at home and at work: > two harddrives, one for / and /boot, the other for /home. > > both / and /home are NILFS2, while /boot is ext3. > > i wanted a very reliable journaling FS on /boot to lessen risk of foobar, > and > also I'm using lilo, which is not supported by NILFS2 yet -- lack of > fibmap > syscall. > > > -- > dexen deVries > >> (...) I never use more than 800Mb of RAM. I am running Linux, >> a browser and a terminal. > rjbond3rd in http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2692529 > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nilfs" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nilfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
