Hi,
On Sun, 20 Mar 2011 13:50:40 +0100, Reinoud Zandijk wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 11:12:37PM +0100, dexen deVries wrote:
> > And so is delete-proofing the on-disk `.nilfs' file. But perhaps the
> > `.nilfs' could be made a virtual file, maintained by the NILFS2 driver
> > rather than a plain on-disk object? You are right about the `.nilfs'.
>
> The problem with looking up /mnt/ is that it (might) return the node /mnt on
> the root FS and not the NiLFS root `/mnt/.' . I don't know how linux handles
> such cases but if `/mnt/.' does return the NiLFS root node then why not let
> NiLFS use that node instead of the /mnt/.nilfs node?
>
> So IMHO the .nilfs file is a hack in itself :-D
The ".nilfs" file is used for two purposes:
1) As the file on which the nilfs library issues ioctls.
2) For advisory locks (i.e. fcntl(F_GETLK/F_SETLK/FSETLKW)). This
works as a mutex between the cleaner and other nilfs-tools.
Note that the nilfs2 kernel code never uses the .nilfs file; it's just
a regular file for nilfs2.
As for the item (1), we can use the root directory of each filesystem
instead. And for (2), a Posix semaphore or other lock primitives may
be available.
In Linux, the advisory lock may be applicable against directories
though I haven't tried yet. If so, we can simply use the filesystem
root directory for both purposes.
IMHO, the .nilfs file should be displaced sooner or later.
Thanks,
Ryusuke Konishi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nilfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
