Hi, On Wed, 7 Apr 2010 12:39:39 +0200, admin@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > Hi, > > At the moment of submitting my cleaner patches, I didn't know if you would > use the new behavior as default behavior or the old one therefore in > documentation I had described that min_clean_segments = 0 would mean > normal cleaner behavior. However as the new behavior is now used as > default behavior, normal behavior might be confusing. That's right. > I am thinking about doing the following changes in documentation: > > in nilfs_cleanerd.conf change > > # Minium number of clean segments > # 0 = normal cleaner behaviour > # >0 = start cleaning if less segments are available > min_clean_segments 10% > > to > > # Minimum number of clean segments > # 0 = continuous cleaning > # > 0 = pause cleaning until less segments are available > min_clean_segments 10% > > I just saw that I had a typo in the word minimum. > > in nilfs_cleanerd.conf.8 change > > .B min_clean_segments > Specify the minimum number of clean segments. A value of 0 means > normal cleaner operation. A value greater than 0 means pause cleaning > until less than min_clean_segments are available. > > to > > .B min_clean_segments > Specify the minimum number of clean segments. A value of 0 means > continuous cleaning. A value greater than 0 means pause cleaning > until less than min_clean_segments are available. > > What do you think about it ? > > If you want to change, will you do changes or should I send you a patch ? Well, that change would be better. Send me the patch, please? Thanks, Ryusuke Konishi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nilfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
