On 25.07.23 15:21, Chuck Lever III wrote:
>> On Jul 25, 2023, at 5:57 AM, Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis) <regressions@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> On 12.07.23 15:29, Chuck Lever III wrote:
>>>> On Jul 12, 2023, at 7:34 AM, Chengming Zhou <chengming.zhou@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> On 2023/7/11 20:01, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 05:40:42PM +0000, Chuck Lever III wrote:
>>
>> Chuck, what's the status here? This thread looks stalled, that's why I
>> wonder.
>>
>> FWIW, I noticed a commit with a Fixes: tag for your culprit in next (see
>> 28b24123747098 ("blk-flush: fix rq->flush.seq for post-flush
>> requests")). But unless I missed something you are not CCed, so I guess
>> that's a different issue?
>
> This issue was fixed in 6.5-rc2 by commit
>
> 9f87fc4d72f5 ("block: queue data commands from the flush state machine at the head")
Ahh, many thx for the update, it lacked a proper Link:/Closes: tag and
mentioned another culprit, so I had missed that!
#regzbot fix: 9f87fc4d72f5
#regzbot ignore-activity
Ciao, Thorsten (wearing his 'the Linux kernel's regression tracker' hat)
--
Everything you wanna know about Linux kernel regression tracking:
https://linux-regtracking.leemhuis.info/about/#tldr
That page also explains what to do if mails like this annoy you.
