On 06/03/2023 18:09, Anna Schumaker wrote: > Hi Krzysztof, > > On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 6:02 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski > <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> On 12/02/2023 15:05, Anna Schumaker wrote: >>>>> From ac2d6c501dbcdb306480edaee625b5496f1fb4f5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >>>>> From: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@xxxxxxxxxx> >>>>> Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2023 15:50:22 -0500 >>>>> Subject: [PATCH] NFSv4.2: Rework scratch handling for READ_PLUS >>>>> >>>> >>>> Patch is corrupted - maybe mail program reformatted it when sending: >>>> >>>> Applying: NFSv4.2: Rework scratch handling for READ_PLUS >>>> error: corrupt patch at line 12 >>>> Patch failed at 0001 NFSv4.2: Rework scratch handling for READ_PLUS >>> >>> That's weird. I wasn't expecting gmail to reformat the patch but I >>> guess it did. I've added it as an attachment so that shouldn't happen >>> again. >> >> Still null ptr (built on 420b2d4 with your patch): > > We're through the merge window and at rc1 now, so I can spend more > time scratching my head over your bug again. We've come up with a > patch (attached) that adds a bunch of printks to show us what the > kernel thinks is going on. Do you mind trying it out and letting us > know what gets printed out? You'll need to make sure > CONFIG_NFS_V4_2_READ_PLUS is enabled when compiling the kernel. The patch does not apply. I tried: v6.4-rc1, v6.4-rc5, next-20230609. Best regards, Krzysztof
