On 04/04/2023 03:01, Olga Kornievskaia wrote: > On Mon, Mar 6, 2023 at 12:12 PM Anna Schumaker <schumaker.anna@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> Hi Krzysztof, >> >> On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 6:02 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski >> <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> On 12/02/2023 15:05, Anna Schumaker wrote: >>>>>> From ac2d6c501dbcdb306480edaee625b5496f1fb4f5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >>>>>> From: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@xxxxxxxxxx> >>>>>> Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2023 15:50:22 -0500 >>>>>> Subject: [PATCH] NFSv4.2: Rework scratch handling for READ_PLUS >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Patch is corrupted - maybe mail program reformatted it when sending: >>>>> >>>>> Applying: NFSv4.2: Rework scratch handling for READ_PLUS >>>>> error: corrupt patch at line 12 >>>>> Patch failed at 0001 NFSv4.2: Rework scratch handling for READ_PLUS >>>> >>>> That's weird. I wasn't expecting gmail to reformat the patch but I >>>> guess it did. I've added it as an attachment so that shouldn't happen >>>> again. >>> >>> Still null ptr (built on 420b2d4 with your patch): >> >> We're through the merge window and at rc1 now, so I can spend more >> time scratching my head over your bug again. We've come up with a >> patch (attached) that adds a bunch of printks to show us what the >> kernel thinks is going on. Do you mind trying it out and letting us >> know what gets printed out? You'll need to make sure >> CONFIG_NFS_V4_2_READ_PLUS is enabled when compiling the kernel. > > Hi Krzystof, > > Since you are the only one hitting the problem, could you be so kind > as to help with getting this resolved. > My setup is not special. It is regular ARMv7 board using a regular ARMv8 NFS server. Anyway my farm is since some time offline due to relocation and will be online in June, so I cannot test anything. Best regards, Krzysztof
