Re: Kernel OPS when using xattr

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The patch from Frank works.
( you can attribute with Tested-by if needed)

Tigran.

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Frank van der Linden" <fllinden@xxxxxxxxxx>
> To: "Tigran Mkrtchyan" <tigran.mkrtchyan@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: "Olga Kornievskaia" <aglo@xxxxxxxxx>, "linux-nfs" <linux-nfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "trondmy" <trondmy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Thursday, 3 December, 2020 17:18:58
> Subject: Re: Kernel OPS when using xattr

> On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 04:43:12PM +0100, Mkrtchyan, Tigran wrote:
>> 
>> Hi Olga,
>> 
>> Franks patches are not applied. I will check with Trond's patch and
>> then will try those as well.
>> 
>> Regards,
>>    Tigran.
> 
> Since my change no longer uses SPARSE_PAGES, it'll probably avoid the
> oops, so give it a try.
> 
> Having said that, fixing SPARSE_PAGES seems like a better option.. My
> ideal outcome would be to have a working SPARSE_PAGES for all transports.
> That would allow GETXATTR and LISTXATTRS to just always specify a max
> size array of pages, giving it maximum flexibility to cache the received
> result no matter what, and avoiding allocations that are too large.
> 
> For now, though, I'm happy with the v2 patch I sent in.
> 
> - Frank



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Media Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Info]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux