On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 04:05:07PM -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 03:59:56PM -0400, Anna Schumaker wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 1:49 PM J. Bruce Fields <bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > Generic/263 is failing whenever client and server both supports > > > READ_PLUS. > > > > > > I'm not even sure the failure is wrong. The NFS FALLOC operation doesn't > > > support those other other fallocate modes, are they implemented elsewhere in > > > the kernel or libc somehow? Anyway, odd that it would have anything to do with > > > READ_PLUS. > > > > I just ran xfstests, and I'm seeing this too. The test passes using > > basic READ on v4.2, so there might be something farther down the log > > that diff is cutting off. I'll see if anything sticks out to me this > > week. > > Thanks! > > Also, wireshark doesn't seem to be parsing READ_PLUS replies correctly. > Cc'ing Jorge since he seems to have been the last to touch that code. Oops, ignore me! I was actually just running the wrong version of wireshark, with a version built with Jorge's patch it's fine. --b.
