Re: xfstests generic/263

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 03:59:56PM -0400, Anna Schumaker wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 1:49 PM J. Bruce Fields <bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Generic/263 is failing whenever client and server both supports
> > READ_PLUS.
> >
> > I'm not even sure the failure is wrong.  The NFS FALLOC operation doesn't
> > support those other other fallocate modes, are they implemented elsewhere in
> > the kernel or libc somehow?  Anyway, odd that it would have anything to do with
> > READ_PLUS.
> 
> I just ran xfstests, and I'm seeing this too. The test passes using
> basic READ on v4.2, so there might be something farther down the log
> that diff is cutting off. I'll see if anything sticks out to me this
> week.

Thanks!

Also, wireshark doesn't seem to be parsing READ_PLUS replies correctly.
Cc'ing Jorge since he seems to have been the last to touch that code.

--b.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Media Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Info]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux