On Fri, 2019-06-21 at 14:13 -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 10:50:59AM -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > > - this duplicates some functionality of the little-used fault > > injection code; could we replace it entirely? > > I'd be really curious to hear from any users of that code, by the > way. > Anna, any ideas? I'm not sure who else has used it besides me, and it's been a while since I have too. > > The idea was that it could be used to test client handling of > exceptional conditions like recalled delegations and partially lost > state. Is anyone regularly running such tests? > > I don't hate the code, and I'm not on a crusade to tear it all out > Right > Now, but it does create a few odd corner cases, so I'm wondering > whether > I could get away with replacing it eventually or whether that risks > breaking someone's scripts. I'm cool with replacing it if there is a better way to do things. Anna > > --b.
