On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 10:50:59AM -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > - this duplicates some functionality of the little-used fault > injection code; could we replace it entirely? I'd be really curious to hear from any users of that code, by the way. Anna, any ideas? The idea was that it could be used to test client handling of exceptional conditions like recalled delegations and partially lost state. Is anyone regularly running such tests? I don't hate the code, and I'm not on a crusade to tear it all out Right Now, but it does create a few odd corner cases, so I'm wondering whether I could get away with replacing it eventually or whether that risks breaking someone's scripts. --b.
