Re: [RFC PATCH 3/5] SUNRPC: Remove the bh-safe lock requirement on xprt->transport_lock

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> On May 3, 2019, at 11:28 AM, Trond Myklebust <trondmy@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> On Fri, 2019-05-03 at 10:21 -0400, Chuck Lever wrote:
>>> On May 3, 2019, at 7:18 AM, Trond Myklebust <trondmy@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>> net/sunrpc/xprt.c                          | 61 ++++++++++---------
>>> ---
>>> net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/rpc_rdma.c             |  4 +-
>>> net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_backchannel.c |  4 +-
>>> net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_transport.c   |  8 +--
>>> net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c                      | 23 ++++----
>>> 5 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-)
>> 
>> For rpc_rdma.c and svc_rdma_backchannel.c:
>> 
>>   Reviewed-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> 
>> For svc_rdma_transport.c:
>> 
>> These locks are server-side only. AFAICS it's not safe
>> to leave BH's enabled here. Can you drop these hunks?
> 
> Oops... Yes, I don't know why I mistook that for the xprt-
>> transport_lock...
> 
> You mean these 3 hunks, right?

Sí.

> 
>>> diff --git a/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_transport.c
>>> b/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_transport.c
>>> index 027a3b07d329..18ffc6190ea9 100644
>>> --- a/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_transport.c
>>> +++ b/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_transport.c
>>> @@ -221,9 +221,9 @@ static void handle_connect_req(struct
>>> rdma_cm_id *new_cma_id,
>>>     * Enqueue the new transport on the accept queue of the
>>> listening
>>>     * transport
>>>     */
>>> -    spin_lock_bh(&listen_xprt->sc_lock);
>>> +    spin_lock(&listen_xprt->sc_lock);
>>>    list_add_tail(&newxprt->sc_accept_q, &listen_xprt-
>>>> sc_accept_q);
>>> -    spin_unlock_bh(&listen_xprt->sc_lock);
>>> +    spin_unlock(&listen_xprt->sc_lock);
>>> 
>>>    set_bit(XPT_CONN, &listen_xprt->sc_xprt.xpt_flags);
>>>    svc_xprt_enqueue(&listen_xprt->sc_xprt);
>>> @@ -396,7 +396,7 @@ static struct svc_xprt *svc_rdma_accept(struct
>>> svc_xprt *xprt)
>>>    listen_rdma = container_of(xprt, struct svcxprt_rdma, sc_xprt);
>>>    clear_bit(XPT_CONN, &xprt->xpt_flags);
>>>    /* Get the next entry off the accept list */
>>> -    spin_lock_bh(&listen_rdma->sc_lock);
>>> +    spin_lock(&listen_rdma->sc_lock);
>>>    if (!list_empty(&listen_rdma->sc_accept_q)) {
>>>        newxprt = list_entry(listen_rdma->sc_accept_q.next,
>>>                     struct svcxprt_rdma, sc_accept_q);
>>> @@ -404,7 +404,7 @@ static struct svc_xprt *svc_rdma_accept(struct
>>> svc_xprt *xprt)
>>>    }
>>>    if (!list_empty(&listen_rdma->sc_accept_q))
>>>        set_bit(XPT_CONN, &listen_rdma->sc_xprt.xpt_flags);
>>> -    spin_unlock_bh(&listen_rdma->sc_lock);
>>> +    spin_unlock(&listen_rdma->sc_lock);
>>>    if (!newxprt)
>>>        return NULL;
>>> 
>>> 
> 
> -- 
> Trond Myklebust
> Linux NFS client maintainer, Hammerspace
> trond.myklebust@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> 
> 





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Media Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Info]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux