Re: [RFC PATCH 3/5] SUNRPC: Remove the bh-safe lock requirement on xprt->transport_lock

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2019-05-03 at 10:21 -0400, Chuck Lever wrote:
> > On May 3, 2019, at 7:18 AM, Trond Myklebust <trondmy@xxxxxxxxx>
> > wrote:
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > net/sunrpc/xprt.c                          | 61 ++++++++++---------
> > ---
> > net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/rpc_rdma.c             |  4 +-
> > net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_backchannel.c |  4 +-
> > net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_transport.c   |  8 +--
> > net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c                      | 23 ++++----
> > 5 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-)
> 
> For rpc_rdma.c and svc_rdma_backchannel.c:
> 
>    Reviewed-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> For svc_rdma_transport.c:
> 
> These locks are server-side only. AFAICS it's not safe
> to leave BH's enabled here. Can you drop these hunks?

Oops... Yes, I don't know why I mistook that for the xprt-
>transport_lock...

You mean these 3 hunks, right?

> > diff --git a/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_transport.c
> > b/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_transport.c
> > index 027a3b07d329..18ffc6190ea9 100644
> > --- a/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_transport.c
> > +++ b/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_transport.c
> > @@ -221,9 +221,9 @@ static void handle_connect_req(struct
> > rdma_cm_id *new_cma_id,
> > 	 * Enqueue the new transport on the accept queue of the
> > listening
> > 	 * transport
> > 	 */
> > -	spin_lock_bh(&listen_xprt->sc_lock);
> > +	spin_lock(&listen_xprt->sc_lock);
> > 	list_add_tail(&newxprt->sc_accept_q, &listen_xprt-
> > >sc_accept_q);
> > -	spin_unlock_bh(&listen_xprt->sc_lock);
> > +	spin_unlock(&listen_xprt->sc_lock);
> > 
> > 	set_bit(XPT_CONN, &listen_xprt->sc_xprt.xpt_flags);
> > 	svc_xprt_enqueue(&listen_xprt->sc_xprt);
> > @@ -396,7 +396,7 @@ static struct svc_xprt *svc_rdma_accept(struct
> > svc_xprt *xprt)
> > 	listen_rdma = container_of(xprt, struct svcxprt_rdma, sc_xprt);
> > 	clear_bit(XPT_CONN, &xprt->xpt_flags);
> > 	/* Get the next entry off the accept list */
> > -	spin_lock_bh(&listen_rdma->sc_lock);
> > +	spin_lock(&listen_rdma->sc_lock);
> > 	if (!list_empty(&listen_rdma->sc_accept_q)) {
> > 		newxprt = list_entry(listen_rdma->sc_accept_q.next,
> > 				     struct svcxprt_rdma, sc_accept_q);
> > @@ -404,7 +404,7 @@ static struct svc_xprt *svc_rdma_accept(struct
> > svc_xprt *xprt)
> > 	}
> > 	if (!list_empty(&listen_rdma->sc_accept_q))
> > 		set_bit(XPT_CONN, &listen_rdma->sc_xprt.xpt_flags);
> > -	spin_unlock_bh(&listen_rdma->sc_lock);
> > +	spin_unlock(&listen_rdma->sc_lock);
> > 	if (!newxprt)
> > 		return NULL;
> > 
> > 

-- 
Trond Myklebust
Linux NFS client maintainer, Hammerspace
trond.myklebust@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx






[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Media Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Info]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux