Re: Is "unmount -f" worked as expected?

["Shawn Lu (shawlu)" <shawlu@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hi:  Brace:

 >On 5/31/18, 12:28 PM, "bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxx" <bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

 >   On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 06:04:52PM +0000, Shawn Lu (shawlu) wrote:
 >   >  Yes, This will a big issue for cross mount.  Luckily, we have not
 >   >  experience it yet due to low traffic.  
 >  > 
 >  >  By the way,  what is your suggestion on the road to enhance “umount
 >   >  –f” ?   Will add kernel config option to support guaranteed force
 >   >  unmount helps?
    
 >   I honestly haven't been following that discussion.  If I were going to
 >   work on this I'd start by studying the previous discussion that Joshua
 >   references.

Thanks for suggestion.  I have roughly go through that thread.   It seems to me there
are still diverges on the opinions.  That’s why I still ask around for what should be the expected behavior for 
“umount –f”.  There is quite a lot confusion caused by discrepancy between Man page and
real behavior for this option.  
  >--b.
  
Thanks,
Shawn 
    

��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����{��w���jg��������ݢj����G�������j:+v���w�m������w�������h�����٥