Re: Is "unmount -f" worked as expected?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi:  Bruce:


>On 5/31/18, 10:34 AM, "bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxx" <bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

 >  On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 04:51:49PM +0000, Shawn Lu (shawlu) wrote:
 >   > >On 5/31/18, 8:18 AM, "bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxx" <bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
 >   >  >  > One case is involved with  cross mounted nfs from different host.
 >   >     
 >    >  >  Note: in theory I think there are some deadlocks possible if client and
 >   >  >   server mount each other.  (Each host could be waiting on the other one
 >   >  >   to process writes before it can free memory that it needs to make
 >   >  >   progress.)
 >  > 
 >   > Yes.  I hope aggressive umount  will  help by setting a very short grace period and timeout before umount.
    
 >   No, the deadlock isn't an unmounting problem, it's a problem that could
 >  happen during normal operation.  I don't know if it's easy to reproduce.
 >   You'd probably need one or both hosts to be writing to NFS very quickly.
   
 Yes, This will a big issue for cross mount.  Luckily, we have not experience it yet due to low traffic.  

 By the way,  what is your suggestion on the road to enhance “umount –f” ?   Will add kernel config option to support guaranteed force unmount helps?
  >  --b.

Thanks,
Shawn 
    

��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����{��w���jg��������ݢj����G�������j:+v���w�m������w�������h�����٥




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Media Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Info]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux