Your mailer's not quoting right, it's a little hard for me to find your replies. Wading in: On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 09:39:04PM +0000, Thomas Haynes wrote: > On Oct 12, 2017, at 12:49 PM, J. Bruce Fields <bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: > > So I *think* the only correct options OK or FALSE_RETRY? > > It can’t be OK if the parameters to SEQUENCE differ. I'm getting that from: "When the replier detects a false retry, it is permitted (but not always obligated) to return NFS4ERR_FALSE_RETRY in response to the Sequence operation when it detects a false retry." If i understand the following language, we're required to return FALSE_RETRY in the case the rpc credentials of the caller map to different principals, but not otherwise. --b -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
