Ping--is there anything holding these up? --b. On Fri, Dec 02, 2016 at 10:53:02PM -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > Since the last version, just two minor changes: > > - client uses the stored supported attribute results instead of > a new capability flag. > - if a nutty client attempts to set both mode and new attribute, > the server returns INVAL instead of ignoring the mode. > > Description, as before: > > The following patches allow the umask to be ignored in the presence of > inheritable NFSv4 ACLs. Otherwise inheritable ACLs can be rendered > mostly useless whenever the umask masks out group bits. > > This solves a problem we've seen complaints about for some time, both > upstream and from RHEL users. > > The new protocol has been discussed in the IETF working group and is > documented at: > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-nfsv4-umask-02 > > It's unlikely that we'll discover problems requiring an incompatible > change, so I think we should consider this for 4.10. > > --b. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
