On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 08:39:39PM -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@xxxxxxxxxx> > > In the NFS case an attempt to chdir out of a removed directory could result > in ESTALE, and that should not cause the test to fail. > > This was causing intermittent failures on generic/011 on NFS. > > Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > src/dirstress.c | 12 ++++++++---- > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/src/dirstress.c b/src/dirstress.c > index f8f73553a1bc..33a166c51819 100644 > --- a/src/dirstress.c > +++ b/src/dirstress.c > @@ -203,8 +203,10 @@ dirstress( > if (verbose) fprintf(stderr,"** [%d] chdir ..\n", pid); > error = chdir(".."); > if (error) { > - /* If this is multithreaded, then expecting a ENOENT here is fine */ > - if (nprocs_per_dir > 1 && errno == ENOENT) { > + /* If this is multithreaded, then expecting a ENOENT here is fine, > + * and ESTALE is normal in the NFS case. */ > + if (nprocs_per_dir > 1 && > + (errno == ENOENT || errno = ESTALE)) { ^^^ this should be == > return 0; > } > > @@ -224,8 +226,10 @@ dirstress( > if (verbose) fprintf(stderr,"** [%d] chdir ..\n", pid); > error = chdir(".."); > if (error) { > - /* If this is multithreaded, then expecting a ENOENT here is fine */ > - if (nprocs_per_dir > 1 && errno == ENOENT) { > + /* If this is multithreaded, then expecting a ENOENT here is fine, > + * and ESTALE is normal in the NFS case. */ > + if (nprocs_per_dir > 1 && > + (errno == ENOENT || errno = ESTALE)) { ^^^ same here I can fix them at commit time, no resend is needed. Thanks, Eryu > return 0; > } > > -- > 2.9.3 > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe fstests" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html