Re: [PATCH xfstests] dirstress: Allow ESTALE as well as ENOENT

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Bruce,

On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 10:47:06PM -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 04:19:11PM -0700, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> > On Nov 23, 2016, at 3:20 PM, J. Bruce Fields <bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > 
> > > From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > 
> > > In the NFS case an attempt to chdir out of a removed directory could result
> > > in ESTALE, and that should not cause the test to fail.
> > > 
> > > This was causing intermittent failures on generic/011 on NFS.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > src/dirstress.c | 12 ++++++++----
> > > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > Sorry, who do xfstests patches go to?--b.
> > 
> > They are sent to fstests@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Might be worth something like this too?

This looks fine to me. Can you please resend as a formal patch? Also the
patch to fix dirstress.c.

Thanks,
Eryu
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Media Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Info]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux