On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 2:08 PM, Trond Myklebust <trondmy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> On Sep 23, 2016, at 13:59, Olga Kornievskaia <aglo@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 1:45 PM, Trond Myklebust >> <trondmy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>>> On Sep 23, 2016, at 13:40, Olga Kornievskaia <aglo@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> >>>> If we instead bump the sequence number in the case of interrupted and do: >>> >>> You have no guarantees that the server has seen and processed the operation. >> >> That is correct, i have tested the patch and made server never to >> receive the operation and client have an interrupted slot. On the next >> operation the server will complain back with SEQ_MISORDERED. Client >> can recover from this operation. Client can not recover from "Remote >> EIO”. >> > > Why not? When XDR layer returns EREMOTEIO it's not handled by the NFS error recovery (are you suggesting we should?) and returns that to the application. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html