> On Sep 23, 2016, at 13:59, Olga Kornievskaia <aglo@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 1:45 PM, Trond Myklebust
> <trondmy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> On Sep 23, 2016, at 13:40, Olga Kornievskaia <aglo@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> If we instead bump the sequence number in the case of interrupted and do:
>>
>> You have no guarantees that the server has seen and processed the operation.
>
> That is correct, i have tested the patch and made server never to
> receive the operation and client have an interrupted slot. On the next
> operation the server will complain back with SEQ_MISORDERED. Client
> can recover from this operation. Client can not recover from "Remote
> EIO”.
>
Why not?��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����{��w��� jg��� �����ݢj����G���� ���j:+v���w�m������w�������h�����٥
