> On Apr 26, 2016, at 4:29 PM, Sagi Grimberg <sagi@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Now we have ro_unmap_safe() which sorta implies that there > is a non-safe unmap? Why not just keep it ro_umap? Er, I would find that confusing too. How about name it ro_unmap_slow(), but it's for asynchronous cases too. > Otherwise looks fine, > > Reviewed-by: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@xxxxxxxxxxx> > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- Chuck Lever -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html