> On Dec 16, 2015, at 10:11 AM, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 10:06:33AM -0500, Chuck Lever wrote:
>>> Would it make sense to unionize these as they are guaranteed not to
>>> execute together? Some people don't like this sort of savings.
>>
>> I dislike unions because they make the code that uses
>> them less readable. I can define macros to help that,
>> but sigh! OK.
>
> Shouldn't be an issue with transparent unions these days:
>
> union {
> struct ib_reg_wr fr_regwr;
> struct ib_send_wr fr_invwr;
> };
Right, but isn't that a gcc-ism that Al hates? If
everyone is OK with that construction, I will use it.
--
Chuck Lever
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
