> On Dec 16, 2015, at 9:00 AM, Sagi Grimberg <sagig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>> diff --git a/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/xprt_rdma.h b/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/xprt_rdma.h
>> index 4197191..e60d817 100644
>> --- a/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/xprt_rdma.h
>> +++ b/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/xprt_rdma.h
>> @@ -206,6 +206,8 @@ struct rpcrdma_frmr {
>> enum rpcrdma_frmr_state fr_state;
>> struct work_struct fr_work;
>> struct rpcrdma_xprt *fr_xprt;
>> + struct ib_reg_wr fr_regwr;
>> + struct ib_send_wr fr_invwr;
>
> Would it make sense to unionize these as they are guaranteed not to
> execute together? Some people don't like this sort of savings.
I dislike unions because they make the code that uses
them less readable. I can define macros to help that,
but sigh! OK.
--
Chuck Lever
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
