On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 03:00:57PM +0200, David Sterba wrote: > > I thought it breaks ABI if we choose a different value for the type > > field of the ioctl. Am I misunderstanding it? > > The ioctl is now private to btrfs, you're going to define the new ABI so > it IMHO should use the generic filesystem ioctl magic/namespace. No, that's completly backwards. We move up ioctls that have prooven to be generally useful to common code, and we've done that with various extN and XFS ones already. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
