(espect -> expect) and (no -> know) Signed-off-by: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@xxxxxxxxxx> --- fs/nfsd/nfs4acl.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4acl.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4acl.c index eb5accf..9c17bcd7 100644 --- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4acl.c +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4acl.c @@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ deny_mask_from_posix(unsigned short perm, u32 flags) /* We only map from NFSv4 to POSIX ACLs when setting ACLs, when we err on the * side of being more restrictive, so the mode bit mapping below is * pessimistic. An optimistic version would be needed to handle DENY's, - * but we espect to coalesce all ALLOWs and DENYs before mapping to mode + * but we expect to coalesce all ALLOWs and DENYs before mapping to mode * bits. */ static void @@ -458,7 +458,7 @@ init_state(struct posix_acl_state *state, int cnt) state->empty = 1; /* * In the worst case, each individual acl could be for a distinct - * named user or group, but we don't no which, so we allocate + * named user or group, but we don't know which, so we allocate * enough space for either: */ alloc = sizeof(struct posix_ace_state_array) -- 2.4.2 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
