> -----Original Message----- > From: linux-rdma-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:linux-rdma-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of 'Christoph Hellwig' > Sent: Friday, August 07, 2015 11:26 AM > To: Steve Wise > Cc: 'Christoph Hellwig'; 'Sagi Grimberg'; 'Doug Ledford'; linux-rdma@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-nfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; target- > devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [PATCH for-4.3 11/15] iw_cxgb4: Support ib_alloc_mr verb > > On Fri, Aug 07, 2015 at 11:19:59AM -0500, Steve Wise wrote: > > I guess I'll post two patches, the NFS fix that preceeds af78181/ b7e06cd, and a reworked patch to replace e20684a. > > > > Is that the way to go in your opinion? > > To me this sounds good. We have a couple patches from Jason's series > that already need to be replaced, so the tree will need a rebase anyway, > so I don't see a problem with replacing ones in Sagi's series either. > If Sagi needs to do a repost for some reason he can just include your > NFS patch in front of the series. I misspoke. I had the order reversed. The order is such that we can add my new NFS patch after: e20684a xprtrdma, svcrdma: Convert to ib_alloc_mr and before these: af78181 cxgb3: Support ib_alloc_mr verb b7e06cd iw_cxgb4: Support ib_alloc_mr verb Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
