On Fri, Aug 07, 2015 at 11:19:59AM -0500, Steve Wise wrote: > I guess I'll post two patches, the NFS fix that preceeds af78181/ b7e06cd, and a reworked patch to replace e20684a. > > Is that the way to go in your opinion? To me this sounds good. We have a couple patches from Jason's series that already need to be replaced, so the tree will need a rebase anyway, so I don't see a problem with replacing ones in Sagi's series either. If Sagi needs to do a repost for some reason he can just include your NFS patch in front of the series. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
