J. Bruce Fields wrote > One way to confirm that might be to run client kernels modified to make > the polling behavior (controlled by > fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c:nfs4_set_lock_task_retry()) more aggressive, and see > if that removes the delays in your case. > > If that works, then it might also be worth considering implementing > CB_NOTIFY_LOCK: > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5661#page-593 I wouldn't mind to test any kind of patch if someone would find the time to provide some. Writing them myself is beyond my skills I'm afraid :-) cu, Frank -- Dipl.-Inform. Frank Steiner Web: http://www.bio.ifi.lmu.de/~steiner/ Lehrstuhl f. Bioinformatik Mail: http://www.bio.ifi.lmu.de/~steiner/m/ LMU, Amalienstr. 17 Phone: +49 89 2180-4049 80333 Muenchen, Germany Fax: +49 89 2180-99-4049 * Rekursion kann man erst verstehen, wenn man Rekursion verstanden hat. * -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
