Re: [PATCH 3/3] NFS: Don't require a filehandle to refresh the inode in nfs_prime_dcache()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 23 Feb 2015 19:14:57 -0500 Trond Myklebust
<trond.myklebust@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> If the server does not return a valid set of attributes that we can
> use to either create a file or refresh the inode, then there is no
> value in calling nfs_prime_dcache().
> 
> However if we're just refreshing the inode using the attributes that
> the server returned, then it shouldn't matter whether or not we have
> a filehandle, as long as we check the fsid+fileid combination.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  fs/nfs/dir.c | 18 +++++++++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/nfs/dir.c b/fs/nfs/dir.c
> index 0da617a61c0b..c19e16f0b2d0 100644
> --- a/fs/nfs/dir.c
> +++ b/fs/nfs/dir.c
> @@ -408,14 +408,22 @@ static int xdr_decode(nfs_readdir_descriptor_t *desc,
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +/* Match file and dirent using either filehandle or fileid
> + * Note: caller is responsible for checking the fsid
> + */
>  static
>  int nfs_same_file(struct dentry *dentry, struct nfs_entry *entry)
>  {
> +	struct nfs_inode *nfsi;
> +
>  	if (dentry->d_inode == NULL)
>  		goto different;
> -	if (nfs_compare_fh(entry->fh, NFS_FH(dentry->d_inode)) != 0)
> -		goto different;
> -	return 1;
> +
> +	nfsi = NFS_I(dentry->d_inode);
> +	if (entry->fattr->fileid == nfsi->fileid)
> +		return 1;
> +	if (nfs_compare_fh(entry->fh, &nfsi->fh) == 0)
> +		return 1;
>  different:
>  	return 0;
>  }
> @@ -469,6 +477,10 @@ void nfs_prime_dcache(struct dentry *parent, struct nfs_entry *entry)
>  	struct inode *inode;
>  	int status;
>  
> +	if (!(entry->fattr->valid & NFS_ATTR_FATTR_FILEID))
> +		return;
> +	if (!(entry->fattr->valid & NFS_ATTR_FATTR_FSID))
> +		return;
>  	if (filename.name[0] == '.') {
>  		if (filename.len == 1)
>  			return;


I believe this will fix the observed problem.  This is partly because the
Linux NFSv3 server either returns both a filehandle and attributes, or
neither.

If a server happened to return postop attributes, but no filehandle, then the
"nfs_compare_fh()" would be a meaningless test.

I think you should abort nfs_prime_dcache if entry->fh->size is zero for
exactly the same reason that you abort if NFS_ATTR_FATTR_FSID is not set.

NeilBrown

Attachment: pgpc8Vp15yY41.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Media Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Info]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux