Re: soft lockup in the laundromat

[Andrew W Elble <aweits@xxxxxxx>]

We're running into something very similar.


fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c:

  1631  static void
  1632  __destroy_client(struct nfs4_client *clp)
  1633  {

    <snip>   

  1652          while (!list_empty(&clp->cl_revoked)) {
  1653                  dp = list_entry(reaplist.next, struct  nfs4_delegation, dl_recall_lru);
  1654                  list_del_init(&dp->dl_recall_lru);
  1655                  nfs4_put_stid(&dp->dl_stid);
  1656          }

  shouldn't that be:

  1653                  dp = list_entry(clp->cl_revoked.next, struct  nfs4_delegation, dl_recall_lru);

see commit 2d4a532d385f635ab8243b88db3136bb52a0bc29

  ?

Thanks,

Andy

-- 
Andrew W. Elble
aweits@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Infrastructure Engineer, Communications Technical Lead
Rochester Institute of Technology
PGP: BFAD 8461 4CCF DC95 DA2C B0EB 965B 082E 863E C912
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html