Re: mount default minor version behavior

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/12/2014 01:41 PM, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 1:10 PM, Steve Dickson <SteveD@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> On 11/12/2014 10:37 AM, Chuck Lever wrote:
>>>>> But I do see your point of not having to recompile mount
>>>>>>> when we want to change the default minor release so
>>>>>>> how that default is set is the question... Maybe
>>>>>>> an environment variable??
>>>>> That's still something that requires a user or sysadmin action, and it
>>>>> wouldn't really play well with autofs and its ilk. As Marie Antoinette
>>>>> would say: "Let them edit /etc/nfsmount.conf”
>>> Fwiw: I thought this was the whole point of nfsmount.conf.
>>> We should be able to rev nfs-utils while preserving the
>>> administrator’s locally chosen default settings.
>>>
>>> +1 for using /etc/nfsmount.conf for this.
>>>
>> The reason the files exists is when we move the default
>> version from v3 to v4 there would be away move the
>> default back to v3 for legacy servers. Way
>> way to move back from the future, if you will ;-)
>> I never thought we would used it to go forward,
>> just back...
>>
>> The problem with setting defaults in nfsmount.conf
>> its not scalable especially in very large
>> installations. I get it that distros can set
>> it during installation, but that becomes error prone
>> when different nfs-utils are used with different
>> kernels. I think we should be more dynamic
>>
>> I think we barrow a paradigm from the server. On
>> server the supported protocols are in /proc/fs/nfsd/verions
>> that rpc.nfsd reads. We should do the same thing on the
>> client.
>>
>> The kernel will tell mount.nfs where to start the negotiation.
>>
>> This will stop mount.nfs for needing to be compiled
>> on minor version updates, plus it solves the problem
>> of different kernels having different protocols enabled.
>>
>> I think this approach much more dynamic and it
>> seems to work on the server side...
>>
> The NFS client modules are loaded on demand. The kernel will therefore
> not actually know the capabilities until we attempt the mount.
>
>
NFS v4.0, 4.1, and 4.2 are all part of the same module, though.  Is there a way to analyze modules and determine what is compiled in?

Anna


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Media Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Info]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux