On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 03:16:50PM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > As a followup to the fallocate discussion I checked what we map ENODEV > to in nfsd. Turns out we map it to NFSERR_NODEV, which doesn't exist > in eiter NFSv4.0 nor NFSv4.1 despite the comment in > include/uapi/linux/nfs.h claiming otherwise. That's interesting. Is there a reasonable alternative, or is this a protocol bug? > I also just ran into another issue where nfserrno translates a large > lits of errors into NFSERR_JUKEBOX, but for v4 we'd really want > NFSERR_DELAY instead for most of them. The distinction is academic as they're both 10008. > Is it time for a version specific errno mapping? I'm certainly not opposed if it turns out to be necessary. --b. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
