I tried to send them to the list, but I guess they didn't come through because my sender was set to chris.perl@xxxxxxxxx, but I ran `git send-email' from work, so the smtp sender ip wouldn't authorized. I'll figure out a way to send them now. On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 4:03 PM, Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 3:40 PM, Chris Perl <chris.perl@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> I just submitted two patches, one for nfs-utils and one for linux-nfs. >> >> As I said in my previous email, the patch to nfs-utils was enough to >> get us farther along, but we failed inside mount(2) with EIO (with a >> decidedly more confusing error message). >> >> So, I've also submitted a patch for the rpc code in the kernel that >> also avoids bind when asking for a random ephemeral port. I've tested >> the combination of these two patches with my system while in the >> situation I originally outlined. I can continue to successfully mount >> NFS filesystems using both of these patches. >> >> I don't particularly love the kernel patch, as it makes `xs_bind' not >> actually bind in all circumstances, which seems confusing. However, I >> thought trying to rework things in a larger way would cause more >> issues given that I'm not very familiar with this code. If everyone >> hates it, I can try something else. > > To whom did you submit these patches? I don't see anything in the > linux-nfs mailing list. > > -- > Trond Myklebust > > Linux NFS client maintainer, PrimaryData > > trond.myklebust@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
