On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 3:40 PM, Chris Perl <chris.perl@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I just submitted two patches, one for nfs-utils and one for linux-nfs. > > As I said in my previous email, the patch to nfs-utils was enough to > get us farther along, but we failed inside mount(2) with EIO (with a > decidedly more confusing error message). > > So, I've also submitted a patch for the rpc code in the kernel that > also avoids bind when asking for a random ephemeral port. I've tested > the combination of these two patches with my system while in the > situation I originally outlined. I can continue to successfully mount > NFS filesystems using both of these patches. > > I don't particularly love the kernel patch, as it makes `xs_bind' not > actually bind in all circumstances, which seems confusing. However, I > thought trying to rework things in a larger way would cause more > issues given that I'm not very familiar with this code. If everyone > hates it, I can try something else. To whom did you submit these patches? I don't see anything in the linux-nfs mailing list. -- Trond Myklebust Linux NFS client maintainer, PrimaryData trond.myklebust@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
