On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 08:56:13PM +0800, Kinglong Mee wrote: > On 7/30/2014 22:16, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > > Thanks! > > > > On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 09:26:05PM +0800, Kinglong Mee wrote: > >> If nfsd_startup_generic fail, nfsd_users isn't decreased right now. > > > > Looks like that should only fail in out of memory cases? > > Yes, it is. > I found this problem through reviewing code. Got it, thanks! Applying for 3.17 and stable. --b. > > > > >> NFSD restarts will return 0 at the first nfsd_users checking, > >> after that, nfs4_state_start_net() will meet a bad laundry_wq > >> (I meet NULL), after nfsd4_grace timeout, the kernel will crash. > > > > So this was introduced with 4539f14981ce02d48b212786a41c8bcfb62851b4 > > "nfsd: replace boolean nfsd_up flag by users counter". > > Yes, I forget adding it. > > thanks, > Kinglong Mee > > >> Signed-off-by: Kinglong Mee <kinglongmee@xxxxxxxxx> > >> --- > >> fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c | 5 ++++- > >> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c b/fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c > >> index 5d026dc..752d56b 100644 > >> --- a/fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c > >> +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c > >> @@ -221,7 +221,8 @@ static int nfsd_startup_generic(int nrservs) > >> */ > >> ret = nfsd_racache_init(2*nrservs); > >> if (ret) > >> - return ret; > >> + goto dec_users; > >> + > >> ret = nfs4_state_start(); > >> if (ret) > >> goto out_racache; > >> @@ -229,6 +230,8 @@ static int nfsd_startup_generic(int nrservs) > >> > >> out_racache: > >> nfsd_racache_shutdown(); > >> +dec_users: > >> + nfsd_users--; > >> return ret; > >> } > >> > >> -- > >> 1.9.3 > >> > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
