Re: [PATCH] NFSD: Decrease nfsd_users in nfsd_startup_generic fail

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Thanks!

On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 09:26:05PM +0800, Kinglong Mee wrote:
> If nfsd_startup_generic fail, nfsd_users isn't decreased right now.

Looks like that should only fail in out of memory cases?

> NFSD restarts will return 0 at the first nfsd_users checking,
> after that, nfs4_state_start_net() will meet a bad laundry_wq
> (I meet NULL), after nfsd4_grace timeout, the kernel will crash.

So this was introduced with 4539f14981ce02d48b212786a41c8bcfb62851b4
"nfsd: replace boolean nfsd_up flag by users counter".

--b.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Kinglong Mee <kinglongmee@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c | 5 ++++-
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c b/fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c
> index 5d026dc..752d56b 100644
> --- a/fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c
> +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c
> @@ -221,7 +221,8 @@ static int nfsd_startup_generic(int nrservs)
>  	 */
>  	ret = nfsd_racache_init(2*nrservs);
>  	if (ret)
> -		return ret;
> +		goto dec_users;
> +
>  	ret = nfs4_state_start();
>  	if (ret)
>  		goto out_racache;
> @@ -229,6 +230,8 @@ static int nfsd_startup_generic(int nrservs)
>  
>  out_racache:
>  	nfsd_racache_shutdown();
> +dec_users:
> +	nfsd_users--;
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> -- 
> 1.9.3
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Media Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Info]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux