Re: [PATCH] net: clean up some sparse endianness warnings in ipv6.h

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 15 Jul 2014 10:01:07 -0700
Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> >  #if defined(CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS) && BITS_PER_LONG == 64
> > -	const unsigned long *ul = (const unsigned long *)a;
> > +	const __be64 *be = (const __be64 *)a;
> >  
> > -	return (ul[0] | (ul[1] ^ cpu_to_be64(1))) == 0UL;
> > +	return (be[0] | (be[1] ^ cpu_to_be64(1))) == cpu_to_be64(0UL);
> 
> Do you need the swap for 0UL?  I know sparse treats 0 as special, so why
> wouldn't it treat 0UL special?  Or just remove the 0UL postfix, no need
> for it in a simple comparism.
> 
> Otherwise looks fine to me.

Maybe not, I did it for completeness sake. I'll see if I can remove
that. The macros do the conversion at compile time though so it
shouldn't hurt anything either way.

-- 
Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Media Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Info]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux