On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 08:04:26AM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote: > Yeah, I was thinking about that last night. I think the parts that could > be broken out are: > > - the change to multiple stateids per lockowner this one definitively should as it is a significant change in behavior. The second batch that seems easily separatable is the improvements of the client lookup and caching, which includes a few patches. > - moving some of the fields into nfs4_stid > - adding refcounting for stateids and stateowners and fixing the > relationships between them These are indeed deeply interwinded with the locking changes. I still think having them earlier would be useful, but if it's too much work we'll have to live with what we get. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
