On Tue, 24 Jun 2014 04:50:58 -0700 Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > FYI, this is what I think should go into a separate inintial series. > > Looks good, > > Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> Yeah, I was thinking about that last night. I think the parts that could be broken out are: - the change to multiple stateids per lockowner - moving some of the fields into nfs4_stid - adding refcounting for stateids and stateowners and fixing the relationships between them Unfortunately, that means a pretty significant respin of the set as a lot of the changes now are mashed in with those that add locking around those parts. I'll give it some more thought... -- Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
