On Mon, 23 Jun 2014 12:10:26 -0400 "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 09:00:01AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 09:56:45AM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote: > > > > - there is some confusion of NFSd vs nfsd in the subsystem prefixes. > > > > While it seems odd and against the usual naming NFSd seems to be > > > > the common one for nfs patches. > > > > > > > > > > I tend to prefer "nfsd", but ok -- "NFSd" it is. > > > > I'd prefer nfsd as well, but in Rome do as the Romans do, so.. > > These Romans?: > > $ git log --pretty=format:"%s" fs/nfsd|cut -d: -f1|grep -v '^Merge'|sed 's/\[PATCH\] //'|sort|uniq -c|sort -n|tail > 8 sunrpc > 12 fs > 13 locks > 15 NFSd > 30 SUNRPC > 89 nfsd41 > 107 NFSD > 228 knfsd > 449 nfsd > 594 nfsd4 > > Anyway, I don't care. > > --b. In that case, I'll go with what I prefer -- "nfsd:". But I will at least go through and make them all consistent. Thanks, -- Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
