Re: [PATCH v1 000/104] nfsd: eliminate the client_mutex

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 09:00:01AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 09:56:45AM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > >  - there is some confusion of NFSd vs nfsd in the subsystem prefixes.
> > >    While it seems odd and against the usual naming NFSd seems to be
> > >    the common one for nfs patches.
> > > 
> > 
> > I tend to prefer "nfsd", but ok -- "NFSd" it is.
> 
> I'd prefer nfsd as well, but in Rome do as the Romans do, so..

These Romans?:

$ git log --pretty=format:"%s" fs/nfsd|cut -d: -f1|grep -v '^Merge'|sed 's/\[PATCH\] //'|sort|uniq -c|sort -n|tail
      8 sunrpc
     12 fs
     13 locks
     15 NFSd
     30 SUNRPC
     89 nfsd41
    107 NFSD
    228 knfsd
    449 nfsd
    594 nfsd4

Anyway, I don't care.

--b.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Media Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Info]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux