We'll make sure it works! I'm about to look through Dros' patches, so I'll know more soon! Anna On 04/23/2014 09:42 AM, Weston Andros Adamson wrote: > Yeah there are bound to be some conflicts between these two patchsets, but > I don’t think it should be too nasty. > > Anna and I can work together to get both sets into a branch once we get things > reviewed. > > The good news is that we can combine testing efforts - both of these patchsets > change the read and write path for all versions of NFS, so we really need to > make sure we didn’t break anything. Not that pnfs isn’t important ;) > > -dros > > On Apr 23, 2014, at 9:15 AM, Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> On 04/23/2014 03:55 PM, Boaz Harrosh wrote: >>> On 04/18/2014 12:09 AM, Anna Schumaker wrote: >> <> >>> yes please keep >>> it on a public tree for quick testing. Perhaps ask Trond to keep >>> it on his tree in a branch. (So to get some coverage under the linux-next >>> tree mongers from Intel) >>> >> >> BTW: anyone tested how much this conflicts with dros's 17 patches? >> (Noticed how it is always 17 patches) >> If a brave sole can have both these merged on the same tree it >> would be easier for the testing. >> >> Thanks >> Boaz >> > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
