Yeah there are bound to be some conflicts between these two patchsets, but I don’t think it should be too nasty. Anna and I can work together to get both sets into a branch once we get things reviewed. The good news is that we can combine testing efforts - both of these patchsets change the read and write path for all versions of NFS, so we really need to make sure we didn’t break anything. Not that pnfs isn’t important ;) -dros On Apr 23, 2014, at 9:15 AM, Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 04/23/2014 03:55 PM, Boaz Harrosh wrote: >> On 04/18/2014 12:09 AM, Anna Schumaker wrote: > <> >> yes please keep >> it on a public tree for quick testing. Perhaps ask Trond to keep >> it on his tree in a branch. (So to get some coverage under the linux-next >> tree mongers from Intel) >> > > BTW: anyone tested how much this conflicts with dros's 17 patches? > (Noticed how it is always 17 patches) > If a brave sole can have both these merged on the same tree it > would be easier for the testing. > > Thanks > Boaz > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
