Re: [PATCH 1/2] SUNRPC: Ensure that call_connect times out correctly

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mar 19, 2014, at 8:39, Steve Dickson <SteveD@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> 
> 
> On 03/18/2014 03:50 PM, Trond Myklebust wrote:
>> 
>> On Mar 18, 2014, at 15:00, Steve Dickson <SteveD@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 03/18/2014 02:45 PM, Trond Myklebust wrote:
>>>> On Tue, 2014-03-18 at 13:24 -0400, Steve Dickson wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> On 03/18/2014 11:58 AM, Trond Myklebust wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Mar 18, 2014, at 11:47, Steve Dickson <SteveD@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Hey,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On 03/17/2014 02:40 PM, Trond Myklebust wrote:
>>>>>>>> When the server is unavailable due to a networking error, etc, we want
>>>>>>>> the RPC client to respect the timeout delays when attempting to reconnect.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Fixes: 561ec1603171 (SUNRPC: call_connect_status should recheck bind..)
>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>> net/sunrpc/clnt.c | 8 +++-----
>>>>>>>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> diff --git a/net/sunrpc/clnt.c b/net/sunrpc/clnt.c
>>>>>>>> index 0edada973434..f22d3a115fda 100644
>>>>>>>> --- a/net/sunrpc/clnt.c
>>>>>>>> +++ b/net/sunrpc/clnt.c
>>>>>>>> @@ -1798,10 +1798,6 @@ call_connect_status(struct rpc_task *task)
>>>>>>>> 	trace_rpc_connect_status(task, status);
>>>>>>>> 	task->tk_status = 0;
>>>>>>>> 	switch (status) {
>>>>>>>> -		/* if soft mounted, test if we've timed out */
>>>>>>>> -	case -ETIMEDOUT:
>>>>>>>> -		task->tk_action = call_timeout;
>>>>>>>> -		return;
>>>>>>>> 	case -ECONNREFUSED:
>>>>>>>> 	case -ECONNRESET:
>>>>>>>> 	case -ECONNABORTED:
>>>>>>>> @@ -1812,7 +1808,9 @@ call_connect_status(struct rpc_task *task)
>>>>>>>> 		if (RPC_IS_SOFTCONN(task))
>>>>>>>> 			break;
>>>>>>>> 	case -EAGAIN:
>>>>>>>> -		task->tk_action = call_bind;
>>>>>>>> +	case -ETIMEDOUT:
>>>>>>>> +		/* Check if we've timed out before looping back to call_bind */
>>>>>>>> +		task->tk_action = call_timeout;
>>>>>>>> 		return;
>>>>>>>> 	case 0:
>>>>>>>> 		clnt->cl_stats->netreconn++;
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> How is this support to work if the trunking code still ignores timeouts? 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> [ 2076.045176] NFS: nfs4_discover_server_trunking after status -110, retrying
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> The above patch fixes the regression that Neil tracked down in Linux 3.12, and that 
>>>>>> affects the generic RPC handling of soft timeouts.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> The trunking code's handling of ETIMEDOUT has been there since Linux 3.7 
>>>>>> and hasn’t changed, so I really don’t see how it can have worked at one time before 3.12.
>>>>> Maybe it been broken that long.... :-) 
>>>>> 
>>>>> But here is the obvious loop that stop that hangs a mount forever:
>>>>> 
>>>>> #8 [ffff88007a22b7e8] rpc_call_sync at ffffffffa0220210 [sunrpc]
>>>>> #9 [ffff88007a22b840] nfs4_proc_setclientid at ffffffffa0505c49 [nfsv4]
>>>>> #10 [ffff88007a22b988] nfs40_discover_server_trunking at ffffffffa0514489 [nfsv4]
>>>>> #11 [ffff88007a22b9d0] nfs4_discover_server_trunking at ffffffffa0516f2d [nfsv4]
>>>>> #12 [ffff88007a22ba28] nfs4_init_client at ffffffffa051e9a4 [nfsv4]
>>>>> #13 [ffff88007a22bb20] nfs_get_client at ffffffffa04bd6ba [nfs]
>>>>> #14 [ffff88007a22bb80] nfs4_set_client at ffffffffa051dfb0 [nfsv4]
>>>>> #15 [ffff88007a22bc00] nfs4_create_server at ffffffffa051f4ce [nfsv4]
>>>>> #16 [ffff88007a22bc88] nfs4_remote_mount at ffffffffa051790e [nfsv4]
>>>>> #17 [ffff88007a22bcb0] mount_fs at ffffffff811b3dd9
>>>>> 
>>>>> The SETCLIENT times out 
>>>>>  NFS call  setclientid auth=UNIX, 'Linux NFSv4.0 10.19.60.77/10.19.60.33 tcp'
>>>>>  NFS reply setclientid: -110
>>>>> 
>>>>> The nfs4_discover_server_trunking() retries 
>>>>>  NFS: nfs4_discover_server_trunking after status -110, retrying
>>>>> 
>>>>> The happens when there server is down and so the connections 
>>>>> fail with ECONNREFUSED:
>>>>>  RPC:     2 call_connect_status (status -111)
>>>>> 
>>>>> The mount system call never times out in which it did in the past. 
>>>> 
>>>> Why should a mount system call time out other than perhaps in the case
>>>> of a soft mount?
>>>> 
>>> So the mount can go in background. As you know the -o bg is used in
>>> the /etc/fstab so the boot does not get hung up with downed servers. 
>>> That's how it always worked... 
>> 
>> No. As I’ve told you already, this has never worked correctly for 
>> NFSv4, and is not expected to work even if we do change the 
>> trunking discovery because path walks etc will still hang. 
> Just to be clear... Are you saying that v4 mounts can/will hang 
> in the kernel forever regardless of what the timeout and 
> retry mount options are?

I’m saying that we should respect the ‘soft’ mount option, but we shouldn’t need to add any new special features for the mount call.

>> Please do this in userland as previously suggested.
> If the above is indeed the case, then I'll have to use signals 
> to interrupt the foreground mount...
> 
> But, if setting mount options like
>   http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-nfs/msg41993.html
> 
> will guarantee will indeed timeout in a timely manner,
> than I would rather using the mount options instead
> of introducing signals into the mix… 

For the case of NFSv4:

1) ‘retry' is pretty much obsolete, since the protocol tells us we must not resend unless the connection breaks. All it does today is to act as a multiplier for ‘timeo’.
2) ‘timeo’ itself only has a user-visible effect when you request a soft mount or a soft RPC call. Otherwise, its main effect is to tell the socket when to ping the server with a TCP ‘keepalive’.

_________________________________
Trond Myklebust
Linux NFS client maintainer, PrimaryData
trond.myklebust@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Media Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Info]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux