There isn't much sense in maintaining two separate versions of rename
code. Convert nfs_rename to use the asynchronous rename infrastructure
that nfs_sillyrename uses, and emulate synchronous behavior by having
the task just wait on the reply.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/nfs/dir.c | 13 +++++++++++--
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/nfs/dir.c b/fs/nfs/dir.c
index 4a48fe4b84b6..e6f8e2c97653 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/dir.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/dir.c
@@ -1911,6 +1911,7 @@ int nfs_rename(struct inode *old_dir, struct dentry *old_dentry,
struct inode *old_inode = old_dentry->d_inode;
struct inode *new_inode = new_dentry->d_inode;
struct dentry *dentry = NULL, *rehash = NULL;
+ struct rpc_task *task;
int error = -EBUSY;
dfprintk(VFS, "NFS: rename(%pd2 -> %pd2, ct=%d)\n",
@@ -1958,8 +1959,16 @@ int nfs_rename(struct inode *old_dir, struct dentry *old_dentry,
if (new_inode != NULL)
NFS_PROTO(new_inode)->return_delegation(new_inode);
- error = NFS_PROTO(old_dir)->rename(old_dir, &old_dentry->d_name,
- new_dir, &new_dentry->d_name);
+ task = nfs_async_rename(old_dir, new_dir, old_dentry, new_dentry, NULL);
+ if (IS_ERR(task)) {
+ error = PTR_ERR(task);
+ goto out;
+ }
+
+ error = rpc_wait_for_completion_task(task);
+ if (error == 0)
+ error = task->tk_status;
+ rpc_put_task(task);
nfs_mark_for_revalidate(old_inode);
out:
if (rehash)
--
1.8.5.3
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
