Steve Dickson <SteveD@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote on 2014/01/09 17:06:41: > > > On 07/01/14 17:23, Joakim Tjernlund wrote: > > Steve Dickson <SteveD@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote on 2014/01/07 22:02:01: > >> > >> > >> On 16/12/13 22:43, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > >>> From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@xxxxxxxxxx> > >>> > >>> By unconditionally adding +/-4.2 to the version string written to the > >>> kernel we make nfs-utils incompatible with pre-4.2-supporting kernels. > >>> > >>> Ditto for 4.1. This problem was introduced by > >>> 12a590f8d556c00a9502eeebaa763d906222d521 "rpc.nfsd: Allow v4.2 server > >>> support with the -V option", which also change nfsd to unconditionally > >>> pass +/-4.2. > >>> > >>> Instead, just don't mention 4.1 or 4.2 unless the commandline has > >>> specifically requested that one or the other be turned on or off. > >>> > >>> Tested-by: Joakim Tjernlund <joakim.tjernlund@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > >>> Reported-by: Joakim Tjernlund <joakim.tjernlund@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > >>> Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> Committed... > >> > >> steved > > > > Thanks, do plan on making a release soon? > Sorry for the delayed response... > > Its in my git tree and in Fedora 20 nfs-utils.... > > Is this what you were looking for? No, I am wondering when nfs-utils 1.2.10 will be released, but I see now that the tree is tagged with 1-2-10-rc2 so I guess it will be soon. Jocke -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
