On Thu, 5 Dec 2013 05:30:08 -0800 Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 06:00:52AM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote: > > The current list_lru_walk_node implementation always walks the entire > > list. In some cases, we can be sure that when an entry isn't freeable > > that none of the rest of the entries on the list will be either. > > > > Create a new LRU_SKIP_REST return value that not only indicates that > > the current entry was skipped, but that caller should stop scanning > > the current node. > > > > Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx> > > I'd call it LRU_DONE, but otherwise this looks fine to me. > Ok, if we end up taking this in I'll change the name... Thanks, -- Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
