Re: [PATCH 1/1] NFSv4.1 fix a kswap nfs4_state_manger race

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Nov 25, 2013, at 3:20 PM, "Myklebust, Trond" <Trond.Myklebust@xxxxxxxxxx>
 wrote:

> 
> On Nov 25, 2013, at 15:10, Adamson, Andy <William.Adamson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> On Nov 25, 2013, at 2:53 PM, "Myklebust, Trond" <Trond.Myklebust@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> 
>>> On Nov 25, 2013, at 14:27, Adamson, Andy <William.Adamson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Nov 25, 2013, at 1:33 PM, "Myklebust, Trond" <Trond.Myklebust@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Nov 25, 2013, at 13:13, Myklebust, Trond <Trond.Myklebust@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Nov 25, 2013, at 12:57, <andros@xxxxxxxxxx> <andros@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> From: Andy Adamson <andros@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> The state manager is recovering expired state and recovery OPENs are being
>>>>>>> processed. If kswapd is pruning inodes at the same time, a deadlock can occur
>>>>>>> when kswapd calls evict_inode on an NFSv4.1 inode with a layout, and the
>>>>>>> resultant layoutreturn gets an error that the state mangager is to handle,
>>>>>>> causing the layoutreturn to wait on the (NFS client) cl_rpcwaitq.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> At the same time an open is waiting for the inode deletion to complete in
>>>>>>> __wait_on_freeing_inode.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> If the open is either the open called by the state manager, or an open from
>>>>>>> the same open owner that is holding the NFSv4.0 sequence id which causes the
>>>>>>> OPEN from the state manager to wait for the sequence id on the Seqid_waitqueue,
>>>>>>> then the state is deadlocked with kswapd.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Do not handle LAYOUTRETURN errors when called from nfs4_evict_inode.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Why are we waiting for recovery in LAYOUTRETURN at all? Layouts are automatically lost when the server reboots or when the lease is otherwise lost.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> IOW: Is there any reason why we need to special-case nfs4_evict_inode? Shouldn’t we just bail out on error in _all_ cases?
>>>>> 
>>>>> BTW: Is it possible that we might have a similar problem with delegreturn? That too can be called from nfs4_evict_inode…
>>>> 
>>>> Yes, good point.  kswapd could be waiting for a delegation to return which has an error along with the same scenario with sys_open and the state manager running.
>>>> 
>>>> With delegreturn, we most definately want to limit 'no error handling' to the evict inode case.
>>> 
>>> Ah… I forgot that the delegreturn in nfs4_evict_inode is asynchronous and doesn’t wait for completion, so it shouldn’t be a problem here.
>> 
>> Except we just changed that to fix a different state manager hang:
>> 
>> commit 4a82fd7c4e78a1b7a224f9ae8bb7e1fd95f670e0
>> Author: Andy Adamson <andros@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Date:   Fri Nov 15 16:36:16 2013 -0500
>> 
>>   NFSv4 wait on recovery for async session errors
> 
> Right, but that won’t prevent nfs4_evict_inode from completing,

Ah - I was thinking of the synchronous handlers call to nfs4_wait_clnt_recover - so yes, no problem

-->Andy

> and hence the OPEN that is waiting in nfs_fhget() can also complete, and so there is no deadlock with the state manager thread.

> 
> Cheers
>  Trond
> --
> Trond Myklebust
> Linux NFS client maintainer
> 
> NetApp
> Trond.Myklebust@xxxxxxxxxx
> www.netapp.com
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Media Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Info]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux