On Nov 25, 2013, at 2:53 PM, "Myklebust, Trond" <Trond.Myklebust@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Nov 25, 2013, at 14:27, Adamson, Andy <William.Adamson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> >> On Nov 25, 2013, at 1:33 PM, "Myklebust, Trond" <Trond.Myklebust@xxxxxxxxxx> >> wrote: >> >>> >>> On Nov 25, 2013, at 13:13, Myklebust, Trond <Trond.Myklebust@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> On Nov 25, 2013, at 12:57, <andros@xxxxxxxxxx> <andros@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> >>>>> From: Andy Adamson <andros@xxxxxxxxxx> >>>>> >>>>> The state manager is recovering expired state and recovery OPENs are being >>>>> processed. If kswapd is pruning inodes at the same time, a deadlock can occur >>>>> when kswapd calls evict_inode on an NFSv4.1 inode with a layout, and the >>>>> resultant layoutreturn gets an error that the state mangager is to handle, >>>>> causing the layoutreturn to wait on the (NFS client) cl_rpcwaitq. >>>>> >>>>> At the same time an open is waiting for the inode deletion to complete in >>>>> __wait_on_freeing_inode. >>>>> >>>>> If the open is either the open called by the state manager, or an open from >>>>> the same open owner that is holding the NFSv4.0 sequence id which causes the >>>>> OPEN from the state manager to wait for the sequence id on the Seqid_waitqueue, >>>>> then the state is deadlocked with kswapd. >>>>> >>>>> Do not handle LAYOUTRETURN errors when called from nfs4_evict_inode. >>>> >>>> Why are we waiting for recovery in LAYOUTRETURN at all? Layouts are automatically lost when the server reboots or when the lease is otherwise lost. >>>> >>>> IOW: Is there any reason why we need to special-case nfs4_evict_inode? Shouldn’t we just bail out on error in _all_ cases? >>> >>> BTW: Is it possible that we might have a similar problem with delegreturn? That too can be called from nfs4_evict_inode… >> >> Yes, good point. kswapd could be waiting for a delegation to return which has an error along with the same scenario with sys_open and the state manager running. >> >> With delegreturn, we most definately want to limit 'no error handling' to the evict inode case. > > Ah… I forgot that the delegreturn in nfs4_evict_inode is asynchronous and doesn’t wait for completion, so it shouldn’t be a problem here. Except we just changed that to fix a different state manager hang: commit 4a82fd7c4e78a1b7a224f9ae8bb7e1fd95f670e0 Author: Andy Adamson <andros@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri Nov 15 16:36:16 2013 -0500 NFSv4 wait on recovery for async session errors > > Cheers > Trond -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html